Talk:Mazzy/@comment-30065616-20190912170324/@comment-30065616-20190912205439

@Curios Poker Chip

SullyxLuna? That's what the creators at the beginning of the "L is for Love" episode made the public believe that Luna was apparently interested in Sully, only to discover that she's actually in love with a girl called Sam. And so it is revealed that Luna is not interested in Sully, and perhaps also vice versa. Although bisexual, I don't think it will work with Sully. He doesn't seem like a boy to me, he seems to me to be a much too quiet person for her who is a wilder type, despite being both rockers.

@L Fray the lovely Fanlady

What should you be worried about? That some conservative families might not really appreciate this LGBT inclusion, going so far as to get so angry that in protest they could force Nickeoleondon to cancel The Loud House. Well, Steven Univers has more characters and lgbt references than here, yet still continues to shake a remarkable success, despite being directed to a children's show ... and up to the film and last season, this series is never canceled or banned. Even Star vs. FOE and Adventure Time have had more courage in including lgbt kisses than The Loud House. In my opinion, the creators were right to include an LGBT among eleven children. If Luna were not bisexual, having eleven children who seem to be ALL pure heterosexuals would not be a very credible reality. At least one of them should be an lgbt, right? LGBT pairs exist in real life and they are people like us. Pretending that there is no sexual orientation other than heterosexuality would mean denying reality and forcing heterosexist nature. I am a heterosexual girl and I believe there is nothing wrong with including different types of love, not just heterosexual ones, in shows for kids. My little cousin liked this show and doesn't think a gay couple is weird. This show is in fact also dedicated to children with gay parents or With some gay relatives in pairs.