Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26901681-20170413012953/@comment-5558012-20170413032826

Whether they go or stay ultimately depends on the culture of the wiki (hence part of the reason for this thread). Some wikis believe every detail should be documented, no matter how minor. Others take the approach of whether or not a page is useful (which can vary wildly).

I believe any minor character you can't give a proper name to doesn't deserve an article. Identifying the character (a name to a face) is perhaps the most important aspect of a minor character. If that can't be done, what is that page really going to offer a reader?

The rest, as I original stated, depends on what the wiki thinks is important. Short pages aren't necessarily a bad thing. Articles can be short and be helpful. Other than my point about names, I personally don't like "skeleton" articles, in other words article shells. If they have very little information and can't be expanded I don't see them very useful (this information could likely be found elsewhere instead).