Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26901681-20170419230352/@comment-26901681-20170425204308

Frostare wrote: What's the veredict Veenster7? Lemme just add that, right now, this wiki seems as official as they get and quite serious about getting the best material (like good-quality pics) and making sure the guidelines are followed. It DOES NOT give the wrong impression. Having said that, I'd worry about content overflow. I honestly don't know what the verdict is. I see some great ideas here. It seems pretty torn between two things, that being using a fanon wiki or leaving things as is. So it seems like limiting it like I initially had in mind won't happen (not complaining, just pointing that out). It seems to be either keep it here as is, or move it all to a fanon wiki.

I appreciate your thoughts on the wiki's current state, and I know what you mean by content overflow. Some pages have had to be deleted because there isn't much on them, but we didn't get many of them over the course of a few months.So content overflow isn't too much of a concern for me.