Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24543133-20160826120637/@comment-24543133-20160826184724

DEmersonJMFM wrote: Never use a poll in a discussion like this (hence I didn't vote in the poll). Comments are much better, plus the wiki has Support, Oppose, and Comment templates.

 I can't really go off character as I don't know you that well, but you have been pretty consistent in activity in the last three months. Edit count and badge total don't matter to me (they really don't indicate whether someone's qualified); it's how constructive those edits actually are. An Admin position requires a deal of maintenance and some of the best Admin preform Admin-like duties before even being an Admin. I've seen some of that in your edits. I'd implore you though to do more. Your edit diversity isn't terrible (some template editing is always good), but most of your recent edits have been as comments or the forum games. I do like that you've started adding references directly to articles.

I'm not actually going to give a vote; I just wanted to add my observations (independent of the wiki's criteria). Regardless, as I stated yesterday, the wiki needs help. I understand. Do you think I should get rid of the poll (users have to vote in comments anyway, because anonymous votes are invalid), or should I keep it? Anyway, thanks for your advice. I guess I need to focus more on mainspace edits, and obviously on how constructive the edits are. About the duties, I'm very often checking the recent changes and Wiki activity to make sure everything is okay. I don't know if any of admins regularly check the recent changes or even Wiki activity, because there were 9 pages to deletion for a while. In fact, they were deleted after I notified one of admins. I think edits as comments or the forum games are kind of useful, though. An admins need to be social and interact with community. I like your knowledge about Wikia, by the way.